Opportunity intelligence for architecture studios

Find better-fit opportunities for your architecture studio.

Timi helps founder-led studios decide which live pursuits deserve scarce principal time, with clear Pursue, Watch, or Skip calls, rationale, and next-action prompts.

Start with one live opportunity, then upgrade to a 3-opportunity deeper review if the first pass is useful.

Proof Assets By Tier

Choose the lowest-friction starting point. Each tier shows what you receive, who it is for, and the expected outcome.

$0

Quick Diagnostic

Who it is for: Architecture studios that want signal on one pursuit before sharing all three.

Concrete example output: A one-page opportunity-risk snapshot with one clear proceed/hold recommendation and one next check.

Expected outcome: Clarity on whether to advance this opportunity or move on within 24 business hours.

$79

Decision + Response Pack

Who it is for: Architecture studios that need the decision plus a sendable response or follow-up handoff they can use right away.

Concrete example output: Decision call plus one response draft, follow-up structure, or handoff tied to the live pursuit.

Expected outcome: Faster next touches with less rewrite once the decision is made.

Public Sample First-Pass Proof

Share this exact proof when a studio asks for an example before sending live opportunities. It is public-safe and shows the Timi output format inside the direct architecture-studio wedge.

Open shareable sample proof

One live pursuit sample

Lake City Community Center + Affordable Housing Redevelopment

Issuer: City of Seattle + Mercy Housing Northwest · Geography: Seattle

Pursue Decision format stays: Pursue / Watch / Skip

Strongest reason: Direct fit with public/community housing work in Schemata's active Seattle lane.

Main caution: Public coordination and partner alignment burden can still absorb a founder-scale team.

Missing-information prompt: Confirm who owns client access and whether decision-makers are reachable before committing full pursuit effort.

Current Studio-Specific Public Proof Routes

Keep the generic sample above as the default trust wedge. Use these three row-specific routes only for the current top-board studios when a closer-fit example is warranted, then move them into the quick diagnostic path instead of the old 3-opportunity intake.

Older studio-specific proof rows are now history-only and intentionally removed from the outbound page so they cannot be mistaken for the current board lane.

Sample first-pass proof

Use this to inspect one believable Timi loop before you send a live opportunity. Review the sample assumptions, then the seeded opportunities, then the ranked calls.

  1. Step 1: Review sample assumptions
  2. Step 2: Review seeded opportunities
  3. Step 3: Review ranked recommendations
  4. Step 4: Review decision reasons
  5. Step 5: Move to quick diagnostic

Ready: review the sample proof or jump straight to the quick diagnostic.

Studio Response Cockpit (Internal)

Track live proof-link threads here, keep reply handling tied to the active state, and copy the correct next-step language without reopening the research notes.

Live Threads

Thread Details

Reply Guidance

Select a thread to load the matching next-step guidance and copy-ready response.

Operating Call

Path Note

Studio Assumptions Workspace

Opportunity Intake

Decision Queue

Top item should be reviewed first. Decision logic and caveats are shown before score details.

Timi makes a first-pass recommendation, not a final bid decision. Each label reflects current fit, effort, timing, and known risks from the information on hand.

Start your deeper ranked review

Send 3 live opportunities you are actually considering and Timi will return a ranked async brief with Pursue, Watch, or Skip recommendations, key reasons, and main cautions.

Main offer: full 3-opportunity ranked review. Fallback only if needed: quick diagnostic on 1 opportunity.

What to send for each of the 3 opportunities

  • Project name or short label, location, and project type
  • Estimated fee range or rough project size
  • Stage or decision timeline
  • Why it is important to your team right now
  • Any known constraint or concern

Turnaround: ranked async brief within 48 hours.

Direct reply path (in-page)

If you prefer direct email over the generated draft link, send your response to john@trytimi.com.

Open ranked review email draft