Opportunity intelligence for architecture studios

Find better-fit opportunities for your architecture studio.

Timi helps founder-led studios decide which live pursuits deserve scarce principal time, with clear Pursue, Watch, or Skip calls, rationale, and next-action prompts.

Start with one live opportunity, then upgrade to a 3-opportunity founder review if the first pass is useful.

Proof Assets By Tier

Choose the lowest-friction starting point. Each tier shows what you receive, who it is for, and the expected outcome.

$0

Quick Diagnostic

Who it is for: Architecture studios that want signal on one pursuit before sharing all three.

Concrete example output: A one-page opportunity-risk snapshot with one clear proceed/hold recommendation and one next check.

Expected outcome: Clarity on whether to advance this opportunity or move on within 24 business hours.

$79

Decision + Response Pack

Who it is for: Architecture studios that need the decision plus a sendable response or follow-up handoff they can use right away.

Concrete example output: Decision call plus one response draft, follow-up structure, or handoff tied to the live pursuit.

Expected outcome: Faster next touches with less rewrite once the decision is made.

Public Sample First-Pass Proof

Share this exact proof when a studio asks for an example before sending live opportunities. It is public-safe and shows the Timi output format inside the direct architecture-studio wedge.

Open shareable sample proof

One live pursuit sample

Lake City Community Center + Affordable Housing Redevelopment

Issuer: City of Seattle + Mercy Housing Northwest · Geography: Seattle

Pursue Decision format stays: Pursue / Watch / Skip

Strongest reason: Direct fit with public/community housing work in Schemata's active Seattle lane.

Main caution: Public coordination and partner alignment burden can still absorb a founder-scale team.

Missing-information prompt: Confirm who owns client access and whether decision-makers are reachable before committing full pursuit effort.

Decision proof

Use this to judge one believable Timi loop before you reply. Review assumptions first, then the seeded opportunities, then the ranked calls.

  1. Step 1: Review sample assumptions
  2. Step 2: Review seeded opportunities
  3. Step 3: Review ranked recommendations
  4. Step 4: Review decision reasons
  5. Step 5: Start founder review

Ready: click “Start the 10-minute demo”.

Studio Profile

Opportunity Intake

Decision Queue

Top item should be reviewed first. Decision logic and caveats are shown before score details.

Timi makes a first-pass recommendation, not a final bid decision. Each label reflects current fit, effort, timing, and known risks from the information on hand.

Start your founder-led async review

Send 3 live opportunities you are actually considering and Timi will return a ranked async brief with Pursue, Watch, or Skip recommendations, key reasons, and main cautions.

Main offer: full 3-opportunity founder review. Fallback only if needed: quick diagnostic on 1 opportunity.

What to send for each of the 3 opportunities

  • Project name or short label, location, and project type
  • Estimated fee range or rough project size
  • Stage or decision timeline
  • Why it is important to your team right now
  • Any known constraint or concern

Turnaround: ranked async brief within 48 hours.

Direct reply path (in-page)

If you prefer direct email over the generated draft link, send your response to john@trytimi.com.

Open founder review email draft