Find better-fit opportunities for your architecture studio.
Timi helps founder-led studios decide which live pursuits deserve
scarce principal time, with clear Pursue, Watch, or Skip calls,
rationale, and next-action prompts.
Start with one live opportunity, then upgrade to a 3-opportunity deeper review if the first pass is useful.
Proof Assets By Tier
Choose the lowest-friction starting point. Each tier shows what you receive, who it is for, and the expected
outcome.
$0
Quick Diagnostic
Who it is for: Architecture studios that want signal on one pursuit before sharing all three.
Concrete example output: A one-page opportunity-risk snapshot with one clear proceed/hold recommendation and one next check.
Expected outcome: Clarity on whether to advance this opportunity or move on within 24 business hours.
$29
Founder Review
Who it is for: Architecture studios that need a tighter decision layer before committing more principal time.
Concrete example output: Sharper recommendation, clearer reason, clearer caution, and the next thing to verify on the live pursuit or top active opportunities.
Expected outcome: A cleaner founder call on where to spend time next within 48 business hours.
$79
Decision + Response Pack
Who it is for: Architecture studios that need the decision plus a sendable response or follow-up handoff they can use right away.
Concrete example output: Decision call plus one response draft, follow-up structure, or handoff tied to the live pursuit.
Expected outcome: Faster next touches with less rewrite once the decision is made.
Public Sample First-Pass Proof
Share this exact proof when a studio asks for an example before sending live opportunities. It is public-safe and
shows the Timi output format inside the direct architecture-studio wedge.
Lake City Community Center + Affordable Housing Redevelopment
Issuer: City of Seattle + Mercy Housing Northwest · Geography: Seattle
PursueDecision format stays: Pursue / Watch / Skip
Strongest reason: Direct fit with public/community housing work in Schemata's active Seattle lane.
Main caution: Public coordination and partner alignment burden can still absorb a founder-scale team.
Missing-information prompt: Confirm who owns client access and whether decision-makers are reachable
before committing full pursuit effort.
Current Studio-Specific Public Proof Routes
Keep the generic sample above as the default trust wedge. Use these three row-specific routes only for the
current top-board studios when a closer-fit example is warranted, then move them into the quick diagnostic
path instead of the old 3-opportunity intake.
Older studio-specific proof rows are now history-only and intentionally removed from the outbound page so they
cannot be mistaken for the current board lane.
Sample first-pass proof
Use this to inspect one believable Timi loop before you send a live opportunity. Review the sample assumptions,
then the seeded opportunities, then the ranked calls.
Step 1: Review sample assumptions
Step 2: Review seeded opportunities
Step 3: Review ranked recommendations
Step 4: Review decision reasons
Step 5: Move to quick diagnostic
Ready: review the sample proof or jump straight to the quick diagnostic.
Send one opportunity first (quick diagnostic)
Lower-friction path for a first pass. Share one live opportunity plus minimal studio context and get a founder
response within 24 hours.
Track live proof-link threads here, keep reply handling tied to the active state, and copy the correct next-step
language without reopening the research notes.
Live Threads
Thread Details
Reply Guidance
Select a thread to load the matching next-step guidance and copy-ready response.
Operating Call
Path Note
Studio Assumptions Workspace
Opportunity Intake
Decision Queue
Top item should be reviewed first. Decision logic and caveats are shown before score details.
Timi makes a first-pass recommendation, not a final bid decision. Each label reflects current fit, effort, timing, and known risks from the information on hand.
Start your deeper ranked review
Send 3 live opportunities you are actually considering and Timi will return a ranked async brief with
Pursue, Watch, or Skip recommendations, key reasons, and main cautions.
Main offer: full 3-opportunity ranked review. Fallback only if needed: quick diagnostic on 1 opportunity.
What to send for each of the 3 opportunities
Project name or short label, location, and project type
Estimated fee range or rough project size
Stage or decision timeline
Why it is important to your team right now
Any known constraint or concern
Turnaround: ranked async brief within 48 hours.
Direct reply path (in-page)
If you prefer direct email over the generated draft link, send your response to
john@trytimi.com.