Opportunity intelligence for architecture studios

Find better-fit opportunities for your architecture studio.

Timi helps founder-led studios decide which live pursuits deserve scarce principal time, with clear Pursue, Watch, or Skip calls, rationale, and next-action prompts.

See quick-diagnostic requirements

Start with one live opportunity, then upgrade to a 3-opportunity deeper review if the first pass is useful.

Proof Assets By Tier

Choose the lowest-friction starting point. Each tier shows what you receive, who it is for, and the expected outcome.

$0

Quick Diagnostic

Who it is for: Architecture studios that want signal on one pursuit before sharing all three.

Concrete example output: A one-page opportunity-risk snapshot with one clear proceed/hold recommendation and one next check.

Expected outcome: Clarity on whether to advance this opportunity or move on within 24 business hours.

$29

Founder Review

Who it is for: Architecture studios that need a tighter decision layer before committing more principal time.

Concrete example output: Sharper recommendation, clearer reason, clearer caution, and the next thing to verify on the live pursuit or top active opportunities.

Expected outcome: A cleaner founder call on where to spend time next within 48 business hours.

$79

Decision + Response Pack

Who it is for: Architecture studios that need the decision plus a sendable response or follow-up handoff they can use right away.

Concrete example output: Decision call plus one response draft, follow-up structure, or handoff tied to the live pursuit.

Expected outcome: Faster next touches with less rewrite once the decision is made.

Public Sample First-Pass Proof

Share this exact proof when a studio asks for an example before sending live opportunities. It is public-safe and shows the Timi output format inside the direct architecture-studio wedge.

Open shareable sample proof

One live pursuit sample

Lake City Community Center + Affordable Housing Redevelopment

Issuer: City of Seattle + Mercy Housing Northwest · Geography: Seattle

Pursue Decision format stays: Pursue / Watch / Skip

Strongest reason: Direct fit with public/community housing work in Schemata's active Seattle lane.

Main caution: Public coordination and partner alignment burden can still absorb a founder-scale team.

Missing-information prompt: Confirm who owns client access and whether decision-makers are reachable before committing full pursuit effort.

Quick Diagnostic Requirements

Use this public-safe path when you want signal on one live pursuit before assembling a full founder review. You do not need to send all three opportunities first.

Send these exact inputs

  • Studio name, contact name, contact email, and primary geography
  • Core sectors or work types that define your current lane
  • One live opportunity with name, location, project type, and fee range or rough size
  • Stage or decision timing, why it matters now, and the main concern or unknown
  • Any assumptions or missing data John should know before the first pass

Expected turnaround: one quick diagnostic reply within 24 business hours.

Open quick diagnostic form Back to tier ladder

Current Studio-Specific Public Proof Routes

Keep the generic sample above as the default trust wedge. Use these three row-specific routes only for the current top-board studios when a closer-fit example is warranted, then move them into the quick diagnostic path instead of the old 3-opportunity intake.

Older studio-specific proof rows are now history-only and intentionally removed from the outbound page so they cannot be mistaken for the current board lane.